Saturday, August 29, 2020

Who Was the Pharaoh of the Exodus?

Content:

  • Summary
  • The Pharaoh of the Exodus
  • Explanation of the New Egyptian Chronology
  • Criticism of the New Egyptian Chronology

Summary


The Bible doesn't tell us the names of who the Pharaohs were at the time of Moses.
The following chapters all give interesting and convincing suggestions as to who
the Pharaoh of the Exodus is, but their names are different.
My personal opinion
is that the suggestion by Christopher Eames gives the correct Pharaohs at the time of Moses. If so, then Amenhotep II is the Pharaoh of the Exodus.

Why it can't be Ramesses II is explained in the following videos:
The biblical Ramesses was rebuilt as the capital of Egypt under Ramesses II, when it probably also got its name, which is used in the Bible even before it got its name
just to locate its place (Exo 1:11, 12:37, Gen 47:11). This is called an anachronism.

The Pharaoh of the Exodus


Christopher Eames is a New Zealander, educated in the US, working in England,
who has a huge passion for Israel. Some of his best life experiences have been digging and traveling around Israel with his friends. He has always had a passion
for things buried in the earth – and no earth is more interesting than Israel’s!

These Pharaohs of the Eighteenth Dynasty ruled in the following order:
Amenhotep II (Pharaoh of the Exodus)→
Thutmose IVAmenhotep III→ Akhenaten.

Hatshepsut, daughter to Thutmose I, was married to her half-brother Thutmose II.
Upon the death of Thutmose II, she ruled as regent to her stepson, Thutmose III,
who inherited the throne at the age of two. Several years into her regency,
she assumed the position of Pharaoh making her a co-ruler alongside Thutmose III
Hatshepsut's reign was a period of great prosperity and general peace.
She was Moses' stepmother. From her reign we get interesting details that point to her being identified as the famous "Pharaoh's daughter" mentioned in the Bible.

See it described in detail in the the article: Who Was the Pharaoh of the Exodus?
It puts the Exodus in 1446 BC and Israel’s entrance into Canaan in 1406 BC.

Akhenaten turned towards Monotheism, specifically the worship of the sun god Aten
He renamed himself after the god, his original royal name was Amenhotep IV.

Akhenaten’s reign marked a time of major upheaval in Canaan.
The invasion of Canaan fits remarkably well with the biblical account
of Israel’s conquest of 
Canaan; the Promised Land, see Joshua.
It started during the reign of 
Akhenaten’s father, Amenhotep III.

An inscription on a pylon from the time of Amenhotep III mentions YHWH,
which is the earliest known mention of the famous name of the God of Israel.

Amenhotep III’s father and predecessor was Pharaoh Thutmose IV.
He publicly declared on the Dream Stele that he was divinely installed. Presumably because he wasn't the firstborn, the presumed heir to the throne
of Egypt. This is consistent with the biblical account of The tenth plague:
the death of the firstborn, which included the crown prince of Egypt.

The fact that the Pharaoh in the Exodus also survived The tenth plague logically suggests that he wasn't the firstborn either. Egyptian records reveal Amenhotep II, father of Thutmose IV, for not being the firstborn heir to the throne either.
This places Amenhotep II as the Pharaoh of the Exodus from Egypt.

Moses died at the age of 120, with his life divided into three 40-year periods:
  • First, he was a prince in Egypt.
  • Second, he lived in the desert of Midian
  • Third, at the age of 80, he was called to deliver Israel from Egypt
    and took them, over a period of 40 years, to Canaan.
If Israel entered Canaan in the late 15th century (1446 BC),
Moses must have been born in the latter half of the 16th century.
This place the birth of 
Moses somewhere within the reign of Thutmose I.

Thutmose I fathered a fully royal daughter, Hatshepsut (born by his great royal wife, Ahmose), and a semi-royal son, Thutmose II (born by his minor wife, Mutnofret).
To secure his son's rightful place on the throne of Egypt, 
Thutmose I had his 18-year-old son marry his 24-year-old half-sister.

Thutmose II's reign lasted as little as three years. A discovery during his reign
sheds light on an Egyptian practice at this time, the killing of enemy boys.

Hatshepsut failed to produce a male heir for Thutmose II, who instead
fathered his successor, Thutmose III, through a concubine named Iset.
However, Thutmose III was only 2 years old when his father died, so Hatshepsut began a 22-year co-regency with Thutmose III 
and became a powerful Pharaoh in her own right.

Including his involvement with his stepmother HatshepsutThutmose III 
reigned for 54 years, one of the longest in Egyptian history. As a sole monarch, 
Thutmose III set about establishing himself as arguably Egypt's greatest,
most powerful Pharaoh. He was undoubtedly Egypt's greatest conqueror.
Through his many campaigns, this "Napoleon of Egypt" (as he is sometimes called) created the largest empire Egypt had ever seen. 
During this long period of time,
it's a good chronological fit that 
Moses was in the royal court of Egypt and then fled into the wilderness of Midian where he lived for a significant period of time.

If Thutmose III preceded the Pharaoh in the Exodus from Egypt, his firstborn son and successor to the throne, the royal prince Amenemhat, would probably be
the Pharaoh of the Exodus. But in Egyptian records, 
Amenemhat is barely
a historical footnote, since 
Thutmose III’s firstborn son died before his father.
When Pharaoh 
Thutmose III died, the throne of Egypt was inherited by a son
who wasn't the firstborn; 
Amenhotep II, the Pharaoh of the Exodus.

Egyptian records show that Pharaoh Amenhotep II ascended the throne at the age of 18 and reigned for 26 years. Several royal inscriptions show that he initiated three massive military campaigns; these conquests occurred in the first half of his reign,
in years 3, 7, and 9. During his third campaign, he apparently imported more than 101,000 captives (the highest number of slaves brought into Egypt by any Pharaoh).
This pharaoh was notorious for his cruelty towards captured enemies and prisoners.

But after his third campaign we have almost no record of his reign. The same is true of his monuments. Of the monuments we have from his reign, some are apparently only partially complete. He died in his early 40s, an age confirmed by analysis
of his mummy. He warned of the dangers of foreign "magicians" late in his reign.

More than 2,000 years ago, Manetho and Chaeremon, both Egyptian priests
and historians, insisted that the Pharaoh of the Exodus was Amenophis (Amenhotep). Amenophis is the Classical Greek form of the name Amenhotep.

This means that Amenhotep II was Pharaoh during the Exodus from Egypt,
and Moses' stepmother in Egypt was the female Pharaoh Hatshepsut.

Explanation of the New Egyptian Chronology

New Chronology (Rohl) is an alternative Egyptian chronology developed
by the English Egyptologist David Rohl and other scholars (see 
John Bimson).

It's re-dating Egyptian kings of the Nineteenth Dynasty to the Twenty-fifth Dynasty,
bringing forward conventional dating by up to 350 years.

It directly affects the Third Intermediate Period of Egypt. Rohl argues that this
would allow scholars to identify some of the most important events
in the Old Testament with events in the archaeological record.
It makes it possible to identify some of the well-known biblical characters
with historical figures appearing in contemporary ancient texts.
 
Rohl's view is that the biblical text (like all other ancient documents) should be treated as a potentially reliable historical source until it can be shown otherwise.

The main reason for Rohl's re-dating is as follows: He claims that the identification
of "Shishaq King of Egypt" (1 Kings 14:25
26, 2 Chronicles 12:29)
as Shoshenq I is based on faulty inference. Rohl instead argues that Shishaq 
should be identified in the Bible as 
Ramesses II, which moves forward
the date of 
Ramesses II's reign by up to 350 years.

Rohl disputes that the military activities of Shoshenq I match the biblical account of Shishaq on the grounds that the campaigns of the two kings
are completely different and that Jerusalem doesn't appear
in the inscription of 
Shoshenq I as a subjected town.

The New Chronology (Rohl) therefore rejects the identification of Shoshenq I 
as the biblical Shishaq, and instead offers 
Ramesses II as the real historical figure behind the biblical Shishaq
Ramesses II, who campaigned against Israel, 
was also nicknamed Shysha. Due to a change of a letter character in the meantime, the name Shysha became Shishaq in the Bible,
which means that they are the same person. 
Pottery is used for dating.

This means that Rohl moves the Israelite sojourn, Exodus, and conquest
from the end of the Late Bronze Age to the latter part of the Middle Bronze Age
(from the Nineteenth Dynasty to the Thirteenth Dynasti/Hyksos period).
Rohl argues that this solves many of the problems associated
with the historicity question of the biblical narratives. 

He uses the archaeological reports from Avaris in the eastern Nile Delta,
which show that a large Semitic-speaking population lived there
during the Thirteenth Dynasti. These people were culturally similar
to the population of Middle Bronze Age (MB IIA) Canaan
Rohl identifies these Semites as the people on whom
the biblical tradition of the Israelite sojourn in Egypt was based.

Towards the end of the Middle Bronze Age (late MB IIB) archaeologists
have uncovered a series of city destructions, which John Bimson and Rohl 
have argued correspond closely to the cities attacked by the Israelite tribes
in the Joshua narrative. Most importantly, the heavily fortified city of Jericho
was destroyed and abandoned at this time.

Rohl shows this and provides evidence that the Exodus isn't a myth but a historical fact, see in The Biblical Exodus. Fairytale or Historical Fact? (by David Rohl):

  • Time      0:40–   15:15: Why Shoshenq I can't be the biblical Shishaq.
  • Time    15:16–   19:04: Why this dating is so important.
  • Time    19:05–   31:13: Why Ramesses II is the biblical Shishaq.
  • Time    38:30–   54:55: Ramesses II defeats the Israelites.
  • Time    57:33–1:12:07: Why academical archaeologists dismiss Exodus.
  • Time 1:12:08–1:14:22: Made assumptions for New Chronology (Rohl).
  • Time 1:14:23–1:30:25: The Israelite stay in Avaris (the land of Goshen).
  • Time 1:30:26–1:47:37: Joseph.
  • Time 1:49:40–1:54:10: The Proto-Sinaitic script alphabet.
  • Time 1:54:11–1:59:57: Moses.
  • Time 1:59:58–2:02:52: The Egyptian collapse and the Hyksos invasion.
  • Time 2:02:53–2:14:57: The new timeline, Jericho, Hazor, and Shechem.
  • Time      2:26–   5:06: The city of Avaris.
  • Time      5:07– 15:48: Joseph.
  • Time    15:49– 18:20: Rapid growth of Semitic people in Avaris.
  • Time    18:21– 20:26: The time of slavery in Avaris.
  • Time    20:27– 24:00: The killing of the newborn boys and Moses.
  • Time    24:01– 25:30: The so-called wrong time period.
  • Time    25:31– 37:30: Moses and the judgment of Egypt.
  • Time    37:31– 41:34: Problem having Ramesses II at the Exodus.
  • Time    41:35– 43:33: Excavations supporting the Exodus.
  • Time    43:34→        : The Egyptian collapse and the invasion of Hyksos.

  • Time      1:11–    2:28: Background information about Dr. Rohl.
  • Time      2:46–    4:50: Questioning the conventional chronology.
  • Time      5:37–    6:40: Implications for Egyptian dynasties.
  • Time      7:03–  11:47: Problem having Ramesses II at the Exodus.
  • Time    12:12–  13:07: Why the Bible is a reliable historical source.
  • Time    13:39–  16:05: Circular arguments in conventional chronology.
  • Time    16:33–  18:52: How to reconstruct the chronology.
  • Time    19:38–  21:58: Carbon dating versus archaeology.
  • Time    22:35–  28:26: The Amarna letters.
  • Time    28:51–  34:15: The Greek dark age.
Rohl identifies, among other things:

Dates proposed by Rohl for these Egyptian monarchs (all dates BC,
NC=New Chronology (Rohl), CC=Conventional Egyptian Chronology):


Criticism of the New Egyptian Chronology


The Christian Egyptologist Gavin Cox provides an alternative explanation
of Egyptian chronology based on the Bible. It differs from 
Rohl's chronology.

  • Time 1:07:58–1:14:13: The Ramesses II problem.
  • Time 1:14:14–1:16:05: The Israelite stay in Avaris (the land of Goshen).
  • Time 1:16:06–1:19:01: At the time of the Hyksos.
  • Time 1:19:01–1:19:58: The time of the Exodus.
  • Time 1:20:00–1:21:39: Chronological synchronism (Shishaq).
  • Time 1:23:11–1:27:03: Problems with C-14 dating, part 1.
  • Time 1:34:02–1:35:07: Incorrect assumptions.
  • Time 1:35:08–1:39:52: Problems with C-14 dating, part 2.
  • Time 1:40:09–1:41:41: The Bible is trustworthy.
  • Time 1:42:09–1:44:04: Why the Bible is neglected.
  • Time 1:44:05–1:47:34: At the time of the Hyksos.
  • Time 1:47:52–1:49:05: Thutmose III was the Pharaoh of the Exodus.
  • Time 1:49:37–1:51:43: The change of a paradigm.
  • Time 1:52:25–1:57:17: Scientific evidence for a chronology.
  • Time 1:57:37–1:59:36: Using pottery for dating.
  • Time 1:59:51–2:01:50: Chronological synchronism.
  • Time 2:02:30–2:10:13: Problems with C-14 dating, part 3.
  • Time 2:16:22–2:19:16: Thutmose IIIHatshepsutAkhenaten.
  • Time 2:19:53–2:20:30:The lack of evidence for the Exodus.
  • Time 2:21:08–2:21:38: Joseph in Egypt.
  • Time 2:22:08–2:23:47: The Hittites.
  • Time 2:24:04–2:24:53: How it affects other nations chronology.
  • Time 2:25:28–2:26:52: The Biblical chronology is reliable.
Then also see the times 38:47–41:39, 43:09–44:00, 48:28–48:55 for C-14 dating

Cox's differs in the following way with RohlCox believes that:
  1. The identification of "Shishaq King of Egypt"
    (1 Kings 14:25
    26, 2 Chronicles 12:29) as Shoshenq I is correct. 
  2. The Hyksos ruled Egypt when the Israelites arrived and allowed them
    to stay there because the Hyksos were a Semitic people,
    like the Israelites. Rohl, on the other hand, believes that the Hyksos
    conquered Egypt later when Egypt had no army to defend them.
  3. Thutmose III was the Pharaoh of the Exodus. 
    Rohl believes Dedumose II
     was the Pharaoh of the Exodus.
  4. Hatshepsut was probably Moses' stepmother.

Friday, August 28, 2020

The Book of Peter

The author is Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ (1 Pet 1:1a). The first letter is written to Christians who lived in the western parts of present-day Turkey (1 Pet 1:1b).
Peter wrote this first letter to people who were suffering and being persecuted
(1 Pet 1:6). He therefore begins this first letter to describe the blessings they
have in Christ. He wants to give encouragement and hope in their situation. In his
second letter he warns against false teachers and calls for fidelity in the end times.

God the Father has given us birth to a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus from the dead (1 Pet 1:3). We are given a new birth to a living hope and have become born again Christians. It's given to those who come to Jesus Christ,
receive what he did on the cross, confess their sins, and turn away from their sins, see SalvationIt's available to everyone. See The Narrow Gate.

Jesus is the one who came up with the term born again (John 3:3–8), see
Jesus and Nicodemus
How then do I know that I am truly born again?

  • We have the promise that everyone who receives him, who believes
    in his name, gives Jesus the right to become a child of God (John 1:12). We are born of God (John 1:13). We become spiritually connected to God 
    (1 Cor 6:17). The disciples were born again when they received the
    Holy Spirit after Jesus' resurrection from the dead (John 20:22).
  • When I receive Jesus as my Savior, it means that Jesus took my punishment when he physically died on the cross (1 Pet 3:18), and that the Holy Spirit comes to indwell me. It's a spiritual process, and it doesn't necessarily involve emotions. Jesus said: "The wind blows where it wishes, and you hear its sound, but you do not know where it comes from or where it goes. So it is with everyone who is born of the Spirit" (John 3:8).
    The Holy Spirit reveals Christ in my life and strengthens me to serve
    the Lord Jesus Christ. In reality it's by faith, I believe I'm God's child.
  • The Spirit of God testifies with our human spirit that we are children of God (Rom 8:14–17), see Body, Soul, and Spirit 
    in The Danger with Gnosticism.
  • We need to regularly come back to God's Word and choose to believe it (Rom 10:17). Because the natural man will always try to come back
    with natural explanations. I need to put my faith in God's Word,
    in what the Bible teaches.
In these promises we can rejoice, even when we are distressed by various trials 
(1 Pet 1:69, 4:16, Acts 5:4041). Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness' sake (1 Pet 4:14, Mat 5:1012). It may be God's will that we must
go through suffering 
(1 Pet 4:19). We should endure all hardships as discipline,
see the first part of 
The Book of JamesA purpose of our sufferings is also
to test the authenticity of our faith
 
(1 Pet 1:7, 4:12Mark 4:1617), see
The Parable of the SowerThe sufferings of the present time aren't worth comparing with the glory that will be revealed to us (1 Pet 4:13, Rom 8:18, 2 Cor 4:1618).
There will be a new heaven and a new Earth (Rev 21:1), see A New Heaven and a New Earth. Death will be no more, and there will be no more mourning, nor crying, nor pain, for the former things have then passed away (Rev 21:4).

As obedient children of God, we should strive to be holy in all our conduct 
(1 Pet 1:1416), see Sanctification. We need to conduct ourselves with reverent
fear of God 
during the time we have on Earth (1 Pet 1:17, Mat 10:28), see
To Fear the Lord in Fear of Man. As Christians, we need to love one another deeply from our hearts (1 Pet 1:18
19, 22, 4:8–9, Proverbs 10:12, 1 Cor 13). We should have unity of mind, sympathy, brotherly love, a tender heart, and a humble mind 
(1 Pet 3:8). We should get rid of all malice and deceit, hypocrisy, envy, and slander of every kind (1 Pet 2:1, Rom 6:6, 11–14), see the following definitions:
  • Malice: The intent and determination to do evil to someone.
  • Deceit: The act of deceiving someone by being intentionally deceptive.
  • Hypocrisy: Claiming to be moral against specific sins
    that one secretly commits.
  • Envy: A resentful longing for another's possessions, gifts, or qualities.
  • Slander: Making a falsely uttered statement with intent to damage
    a person's reputation.
We shouldn't repay evil for evil or insult for insult, on the contrary we should bless 
(1 Pet 3:9), see Love and not revenge in The Sermon on the Mount.
We should pray that those who persecute us will be blessed. 
We should dress in humility towards one another (1 Pet 5:5, Mat 11:2830).

Jesus is the cornerstone, the foundation of Christians
(1 Pet 2:6, Isaiah 28:16, Psalm 118:22, Zec 10:4, Mat 21:42, Mark 12:10,
Luk 20:17, Acts 4:11, 
Eph 2:20). The foundation is founded on Jesus Christ.
All
 true Christian churches must be built on faith in Jesus and what he did
on the cross, see 
Jesus, the Way, the Truth and the Life

We as Christians are called to be a holy priesthood (1 Pet 2:5, 9). As Christians,
we should abstain from the passions of the flesh (1 Pet 2:11, 
Eph 4:1719). 
We shouldn't compromise with God's Word and with God's values (1 John 2:15
17).
We should wait for God's timing.

It's a gracious thing when you are aware of God, you endure sorrows while you suffer unjustly (1 Pet 2:19–21). We are blessed when others revile and persecute us because of our faith in Jesus (Mat 5:1112, 10:22, 24:9). However,
it's not a blessing if we suffer because we break the law or disobey authorities
(when it's not against the will of God) 
(1 Pet 2:1315, 20a, Rom 13:17), see
This World is Not Our Home in The Book of Romans. It's not a 
blessing to suffer for being disrespectful (1 Pet 2:1718). In this, Jesus is an example for us to follow (1 Pet 2:2123).

The main reason Jesus came was to die for our sins (1 Pet 2:24). Jesus became cursed for us when he took our sin on the cross (Gal 3:13, Deu (5 Mos) 21:2223). 

By his wounds we are healed (1 Pet 2:24b, Isaiah 53:5b). Note that the word healed in this context doesn't refer to physical healing. There are many false teachings about healing and about these verses. See this explained further in chapter False Teaching on Healing in Word of Faith Movement in the U.S.
In this context it's about spiritual healing. It's about Salvation.
Christ's sacrifice heals our sinful condition and satisfies the penalty for our sin. Spiritual gifts also exist in our time, we can pray for healing and people are healed. But 
Christ's sacrifice doesn't mean that all true believers are promised
physical healing in this life.

There is beauty that is external and beauty that is internal. We shouldn't focus on external beauty but on God. A woman's beauty shouldn't derive from the outside
but from the inside (1 Pet 3:3–4). The use of jewelry or fine clothing shouldn't be excessive (1 Tim 2:9). We must not focus on such things,
see How should a woman dress? in The Woman's Place in the Congregation.

A leader in a congregation should oversee and shepherd the flock of God that's among him (it's not the flock of a leader, it's the flock of God), not under compulsion, nor for shameful gain, not being greedy or focused on money, but serve eagerly and willingly (1 Pet 5:1–2). Don't be domineering or controlling, 
see the end part in The Book of John, but be an example to the flock (1 Pet 5:3).
To summarize:
  • Not serving under compulsion.
  • Not greedy or focused on money.
  • Not domineering or controlling.
  • Be an example to the flock.
When choosing a leader in a congregation, it's about recognizing a person
called by God to be a leader in that congregation.
 

God's divine power has given us everything we need, both for life and for a godly life through our experiential knowledge of him who called us by his own glory
and goodness 
(2 Pet 1:3). But we shouldn't base our faith on experience alone,
but on God's promises in the Scripture. 
That's why we should do everything to supplement our faith with virtue, virtue with knowledgeknowledge with self-control, self-control with steadfastness, steadfastness with godlinessgodliness with brotherly affection, and brotherly affection with love (2 Pet 1:57).

People will gather around false teachers who will tell them what they want to hear, and who will secretly bring in destructive heresies (2 Pet 2:12). Many of them will deny central Christian doctrines. They use the words of the Bible but give them false interpretations. They teach doctrines that make people feel good. Greed is one of their major motives (2 Pet 2:3). They are wolves in sheep's clothing (Mat 7:1520). They follow the way of Balaam, who loved the gain of unrighteousness (2 Pet 2:15), see Balaam and Balak. We shouldn't be deceived by these false teachers, see 
Beware of false prophets in The Sermon on the Mount
It would have been better never to have known the way of righteousness if one turned away from Jesus
after believing in him 
(2 Pet 2:2021). God judges sin in one way or another
(2 Pet 2:4
6).

The present heaven and Earth are preserved for fire and are preserved until the day of judgment and the destruction of the ungodly (2 Pet 3:7, 1012, Isaiah 66:1516,
Mal 4:1), see 
A New Heaven and a New EarthThe Lord isn't slow to fulfill his promise but is patient with us and doesn't wish for anyone to perish,
but for all to come to repentance (2 Pet 3:9), see Salvation.

Wednesday, August 26, 2020

The Book of Jude

The author introduces himself as Jude, brother of James (Jde 1:1a, Gal 1:19),
see 
The Book of JamesJude and James were half-brothers of Jesus. 

Jude warns of godless people in the church, who have taken God's grace and made it to a license to sin (Jde 1:4)The Lord rescued the people of Israel from the land of Egypt, but on the way to the promised land he destroyed those who didn't believe (Jde 1:5), see for example Twelve Spies Exploring Canaan
in Moses; Part 13: Rebellion and Paganism. Such people can have a devastating 
influence in the church 
(Gal 5:7
9, 1 Cor 15:33). People in Sodom and Gomorrah
gave themselves over to sexual immorality and is presented as an example and suffers the vengeance of eternal fire (Jde 1:7), see Homosexuality. What happened in 
Sodom and Gomorrah is a reminder for us, see The Life of Abraham

Likewise, these godless people also defile the flesh, reject authority, and speak evil of dignitaries (Jde 1:8, 2 Pet 2:911). They live only to please their flesh.
We shouldn't pronounce a blasphemous judgment against anyone (Jde 1:910)

see time 13:37–14:37 in 
Bible Q & A With Pastor Paul │December 2023They have walked in the way of Cain (Gen (1 Mos) 4:611), have greedily run in Balaam's delusion for gain, see Balaam and Balak, and perished in Korah's rebellion
(Num (4 Mos) 16:1
35), see 6. Korah’s Rebellion in 
Moses; Part 13: Rebellion and Paganism (Jde 1:11). False teachers do all of this. 

They are shepherds who feed only themselves (Jde 1:12a). They follow their own sinful desires, show favoritism to gain advantages, and cause division
(Jde 1:16, 18
19, 2 Pet 3:34a). 

Instead, you should aim to do as follows:

  1. Build yourself up in faith (Jde 1:20a), see How to Build Your Faith.
  2. Pray in the Holy Spirit (Jde 1:20b), as the Holy Spirit leads in our heart.
  3. Keep yourself in God's love (Jde 1:21a), see Faith, Hope, and Agape Love.
  4. Wait for God's mercy (Jde 1:21b), see The Parable of the Persistent Widow.
  5. Exercise mercy toward doubters (Jde 1:22).
  6. Share your faith with unbelievers (Jde 1:23a).
  7. Show mercy to people who live in sin, but keep your distance (Jde 1:23b).
  8. Hate all sin (but not sinners) (Jde 1:23c).